The Context Layer

Your data stack explains how.ClariLayer explains what it means.

Warehouses compute numbers and semantic layers execute queries. ClariLayer preserves the intent, validation evidence, approval state, and contract metadata that make a metric safe for people and agents to reuse.

Start Free

Your data stack needs lifecycle evidence before automation.

Warehouses store data

Databricks, Snowflake, and BigQuery can store and compute the raw ingredients. ClariLayer adds the metric lifecycle evidence that says which definition is approved, current, and safe to reuse.

Semantic layers execute queries

Semantic layers and dbt models are necessary execution surfaces. ClariLayer prepares the governed contract, owner context, and validation state those downstream tools should receive.

The lifecycle evidence gap

What the metric means, who approved it, which version is current, when it was validated, and what it is allowed to power. That evidence needs a durable home before AI agents act on it.

Metric Lifecycle Management

The feature set follows the metric lifecycle, not a vendor map.

ClariLayer is built around the path a business metric takes from first intent to trusted consumption. A revenue operations lead may know the policy nuance, an analytics engineer may own the warehouse connection, and an AI transformation team may own the agent that consumes the final contract. The product keeps those responsibilities connected without forcing every participant into the same tool or workflow.

That is why the public feature pages connect to one another. Authoring, validation, governance, registry discovery, and API access all preserve the same underlying evidence. A metric definition should not lose its reasoning when it moves from a conversation to a release bundle, or from a release bundle to an AI agent.

The workflow is intentionally neutral about the warehouse and semantic layer underneath it. Catalog browse, validation probes, direct deploy, and rollback are shared across Databricks, Snowflake, and BigQuery. Observe/query-history ingestion remains Databricks-only today. ClariLayer is where the business contract is made explicit: which definition is current, what it is allowed to power, and what evidence proves it has been checked.

A reader can start with the overview, jump into a specific workflow, inspect API details, and return to use cases without losing the thread of the product promise. The public site keeps the path from problem framing to docs, pricing, and use cases short enough for buyers and technical reviewers to verify the claim.

Define business intent

Metric work starts where the business owner has the most context: the conversation about what the number should mean. ClariLayer captures that intent, related definitions, template choices, source assumptions, and the reasoning trail before anyone treats the metric as production logic.

Explore AI-assisted metric authoring in Metric Studio

Validate against warehouse reality

The next question is whether the proposed logic actually runs against the current warehouse. Validation probes live Databricks, Snowflake, or BigQuery connections for catalog fit, SQL compilation, and bounded data checks so teams can catch broken assumptions before a dashboard or AI agent consumes them.

Explore warehouse validation for live data checks

Govern release decisions

Different metrics deserve different rigor. Experimental definitions can move quickly, operational definitions can require validation and owner review, and financial definitions need stronger review. The release artifact preserves approval state, validation evidence, version history, and the human reasoning that explains why the metric changed.

Explore tier-based metric governance and release evidence

Serve context to every consumer

Once a metric is governed, the registry and API give downstream systems a stable contract. AI agents, BI tools, and internal applications can ask for the approved definition, owner, version, policy tier, and trust signals instead of scraping stale warehouse artifacts.

Explore the Contract API for AI agents and BI tools

Evidence Model

Every feature adds evidence a consumer can inspect.

A context layer earns trust by being specific. It should show what was proposed, which warehouse assumptions were checked, who approved the release, which version is current, and what downstream systems should use. Those details matter for humans, and they matter even more when an AI agent is deciding whether to act on a metric.

For a more scenario-led view, read the metric trust and AI governance use cases. For implementation details behind the public contract, start with the Metrics Contract API documentation.

For commercial evaluation, the same evidence model connects to ClariLayer pricing and Free Core usage. For editorial context, the ClariLayer blog on metric governance and AI context expands the use cases into implementation guidance.

The goal is a public path that mirrors the product path: problem, workflow, evidence, integration surface, and trust signals stay connected instead of scattering across isolated pages.

Problem context

Teams do not only need the SQL. They need the business question, the excluded edge cases, the scope of the metric, and the tradeoffs behind the definition. That context is captured during authoring instead of reconstructed months later.

Workflow state

A metric should say whether it is draft, validated, approved, released, or deprecated. Lifecycle state tells people and agents whether the definition is safe for experimentation, operations, or board-level reporting.

Integration surface

Catalog browse, validation probes, direct deploy, and rollback are shared across Databricks, Snowflake, and BigQuery. Observe/query-history ingestion remains Databricks-only today.

Trust trail

Governed metrics expose ownership, approval context, validation reports when present, immutable release history, and conversation audit trail. That is the evidence an analytics engineer, auditor, or AI agent needs before relying on a number.

Semantic-layer handoff

ClariLayer does not replace execution tools. It creates the governed contract those tools should receive: SQL logic, business description, source assumptions, release metadata, validation status, and review guidance.

Short paths to adoption

Public pages link from problem framing to feature detail, API documentation, pricing, and editorial context so buyers, champions, and technical reviewers can investigate without starting over.

Catalogs and semantic layers are necessary.ClariLayer adds lifecycle context.

The distinction is not whether adjacent tools matter. It is where each system is native, partial, or operating as downstream context during the metric lifecycle.

Warehouse and asset discovery

Data CatalogNative
Semantic LayerPartial
ClariLayerUses during lifecycle

Metric computation/execution

Data CatalogNot primary
Semantic LayerNative
ClariLayerHandoff/API context

Business meaning, owner, and approved version

Data CatalogPartial
Semantic LayerPartial
ClariLayerNative

AI-assisted definition workflow

Data CatalogNot primary
Semantic LayerNot primary
ClariLayerNative

Live validation evidence

Data CatalogPartial
Semantic LayerPartial
ClariLayerNative

Governed release bundles, approvals, and audit trail

Data CatalogPartial
Semantic LayerPartial
ClariLayerNative

Contract API for AI and BI consumers

Data CatalogNot primary
Semantic LayerPartial
ClariLayerNative

Ready to close the context gap?

Join the companies building a trusted context layer for their AI agents and business teams.

Start Free